data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4a0fc/4a0fc3f99c5ceae6099e95aac120211a5d0cffb9" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b4ff6/b4ff6efd58f9964c9d40131d20de101f70f27c2d" alt=""
I can't quite say that architect Zaha Hadid's show at
Max Protetch gallery is an art exhibit. Yes, architecture is art, but are paintings of 3-D models used to promote the structure considered to be art or just another way to imagine what the finished product will look like? When I've gone to architecture exhibits, I enjoy seeing all the tools--blueprints, models, and photographs--to get a sense of the architect's vision. At this show, which coincides with a retrospective of Hadid at the Guggenheim, I felt a tad bit short-changed. The only aspect of Hadid's vision we see here are the "Silver Paintings" and a 12-foot long bench. The images themselves felt claustrophobic and had a passe futuristic look. If I want to get a sense of Hadid, I think I'll have to check out the Guggenheim exhibition.
(Images via Max Protetch gallery)Labels: Art exhibits
<< Home